Press "Enter" to skip to content

Posts tagged as “voting”

(Archive March 2016) Sexism vs. Reality: It’s Not Sexist to Vote Against Hilary Clinton

By Jason Greenough | Arts & Entertainment Editor

flickr.com/aaron_webb

It’s primary season, as you know, and the Presidential race is becoming more and more vibrant and intense as the days pass by. By the time you read this, Bernie Sanders has already won New Hampshire, and Hillary Clinton claimed the victory in Iowa by a margin of less than 1%. Also by the time you read this, you will have seen a mix of primaries and caucuses in 20 other states and provinces, thanks to Super Tuesday.

That’s not all you will see, however. Be prepared to see mud flinging like never before, as candidates will scratch and scramble to garner votes to retain viability in the race for the White House. One candidate I would like to point out as a strong force in this mud-slinging is the once well-respected Senator from New York and former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton. read more

(Archive March 2016) Voting: Your American Right, and Responsibility

By Jamie Parker | News Editor

Every four years, The United States of America goes through the election process to inaugurate a new President. Most foreigners expect that since Americans are born with the right to help make this decision, that every eligible man and woman would. But in the past four elections, only an average of 58.6% of eligible Americans turned out to the polls. Now the funny thing about this, is that most people who decide not to vote, think it’s because their vote doesn’t matter. That, or they don’t know enough about politics to make an educated decision. But in fact, your vote does count. And it is very important that you, as a citizen take advantage of our most democratic right. read more

(Archive March 2016) Primaries and Caucuses Underway for 2016

By Stevie LaBelle | Assistant Editor

The 2016 Presidential primaries and caucuses have commenced. Both of Iowa’s caucuses, New Hampshire’s primary, Nevada’s democratic caucus, and South Carolina’s republican primary have been held as of February 20th.

The Iowa caucuses were held on February 1st. The Democratic caucus winner was Hilary Clinton with a close 49.9% to Bernie Sanders’s 49.6%. The Republican caucus winner was Ted Cruz with a 27.6% to Donald Trump’s 24.3% and Marco Rubio’s 23.1%. read more

(Archive February 2016) Prime Time for Presidential Primaries

By Stevie LaBelle | Assistant Editor

Courtesy photo / Flickr.com/Kclvey

As 2016 begins so does the energy leading into this year’s Presidential Election.  For Massachusetts residents the primary state election will be held on March 1, 2016.  For New Hampshire residents the state primary is held on February 9, 2016.  

These primaries are coming up quick, and so are the deadlines for registering to vote or to change political party designations.  In Massachusetts, residents must register or change their party designations by February 10, 2016 according to www.sec.state.ma.us/ele/.  In New Hampshire, residents are advised to register to vote 10 days prior to the election.  However according to the New Hampshire state government webpage www.nh.gov those who are eligible to vote may do so on the day of the election. read more

(Archive February 2016) Voting Culture at the Mount

By Stevie LaBelle | Assistant Editor

Does Mount Wachusett Community College breed an engaged atmosphere in regards to elections and informed voter – culture? The overall consensus is no, it does not.  

“The upcoming presidential election is invisible,” commented Professor Reed Hillman, a Criminal Justice and Politics professor as well as former Representative for the House.  

Only months away from the primaries for both Massachusetts and New Hampshire, and yet there is no signs that a presidential election is coming.  Hillman believes that this is the most crucial time in the election period.  He feels that if more people would get involved in this stage, before the candidates for each party are chosen, then it would breed better candidates for our country’s presidency.   read more

One Person, One Vote

A student’s opinion on why ranked choice voting should be implemented

By Aidan Lane
Observer Contributor

Image from Wikimedia Commons

If Question 2 passes in Massachusetts, our voting system will transition from our current, overly simplistic one to a scheme called ‘ranked choice’. While this question does not have the same propaganda presence as Question 1, it is deadly important for any citizen of a democracy.

            ‘One Person, One Vote’ has long been a rallying cry for those who are in favor of more enfranchisement (and against the electoral college), and this is a great maxim for expanding voting rights. However, once the pool of those who can vote is sufficiently enlarged, every detail can be either a promoter or a hinderance to democracy, even details as small as how someone votes. read more

A Suitable Compromise

Townsend voting protocols section off voters refusing masks

By Seth Farley
Observer Contributor

Image by OKJaguar from Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

Townsend, Massachusetts’ voting protocol for 2020 states that, while they advise that all who wish to vote in person to wear masks when entering Memorial Hall, those who do not wear masks will be directed to a precinct where they will wait until all other voters have left.

Kathleen Spofford, Townsend Town Clerk states that the reason non mask wearers will not be removed from the voting precincts is because the town believes it would be a violation of citizen’s voting rights. Spofford also mentions that the town of Townsend is expecting a record low turnout for in person voting this election. read more

(Archive November 2016) DNC and Clinton Campaign Caught in Alleged Illegal Activity

Investigative Tapes cause Two Democratic Operatives to Lose their Jobs Just Days Before Final Debate

By Rebekah Chiasson | Assistant Editor

An anti-Hillary Clinton promotional decoration prior to the release of O’Keefe’s video.

Democratic operative, Robert Creamer, stepped down from his position at Democracy Partner and Scott Foval was fired on October 18, just two days before the third and final presidential debate, due to the release of an undercover investigative video from James O’Keefe.

O’Keefe’s Veritas Project, a non-profit dedicated to uncovering dishonesty, corruption, waste and fraud in public and private cooperations, released its latest investigative video project claiming illegal activity from the Clinton campaign. MWCC student and Trump supporter, Jack Korman says, “Honestly, I don’t even care about Creamer and Foval, I am more worried that the mainstream media is barely covering it.” read more

(Archive November 2016) Question 4: An In-Depth Look

By Jamie Parker | News Editor

One of the most talked about questions of this election year for Massachusetts is Question 4: Legalization, Regulation, and Taxation of Marijuana. A “yes” vote on this question would, “allow persons 21 and older to possess, use, and transfer marijuana concentrate (including edible products) and to cultivate marijuana, all in limited amounts, and would provide for the regulation and taxation of commercial sale of marijuana and marijuana products.” A “no” vote would keep the laws on marijuana in Massachusetts the same as they are now. So let’s take a deeper look into what the “Regulation and Taxation of Marijuana Act,” the “Marijuana Tax,” and the “Regulation of Use and Distribution of Marijuana NOT Medically Prescribed.”

The Regulation and Taxation of Marijuana Act

            The purpose of this act is to control the production and distribution of marijuana. The act works on a system that licenses, regulates, and taxes businesses involved. The system is very similar to that of businesses that deal with Alcohol. It would allow adults over the age of 21 to purchase, and even grow a limited amount of marijuana. The act would have its own advisory board, the “Cannabis Advisory Board.” The board would make recommendations on the regulation of marijuana. The Cannabis Advisory Board would consist of 15 board members assigned by the governor. There would be one expert on marijuana cultivation, one expert in marijuana retailing, one expert in marijuana product manufacturing, one expert in marijuana testing, one board member or officer of a medical marijuana treatment center, one registered medical marijuana patient, one person to represent recreational marijuana consumers, two experts in public health, two experts in law enforcement, two experts in social welfare/justice, and two attorneys with experience with marijuana related cases. Each member will serve a term of two years. The members will not be paid for their work, but they will be reimbursed for expenses they run into while performing advisory board duties.

Marijuana Tax

One of the major arguments in favor of legalization is the potential tax revenue the state would gain. The excise tax for the sale of marijuana and marijuana products would be 3.75% of the total price of the sale. However, on top of that, each city or town has the right to impose its own sales tax on top of that of up to 2%. This collected tax revenue could be used towards things like improving our education system, and the infrastructure around the state.

Regulation of the Use and Distribution of Marijuana NOT Medically Prescribed

            In this section, we’ll go over the different regulations, and limitations that will be put into place if legalization is passed. Just like alcohol and guns, marijuana will have its own rules and requirements. These are some of the major limitations: Much like alcohol, it will be illegal to operate any sort or heavy machinery/ motor vehicles under the influence. Also the consumption of marijuana would be illegal on the public or private grounds of any educational facility where grades 1 through 12 are taught, and any negligent conduct would be treated very similarly to that of the current public intoxication laws. A marijuana dispensary will not be permitted to open within 500 feet of a school serving grades K through 12.

As far as regulation goes, here are some of the major points. Marijuana establishments could pay up to $3000 for the application to become a licensed dispensary. If their application is accepted, the license itself will cost the owners another $15,000 to obtain. Dispensaries will be require to have certain security measures as well. This includes actual security guards, specific lighting, video and alarm requirements, and secure storage for the marijuana. There will be random testing of samples of marijuana to ensure that all marijuana is labeled, and advertised correctly. There will be restrictions on the advertising to marijuana to avoid being attractive eto children. There are also a few rules for the personal use of marijuana. An individual may have up to 10 ounces of marijuana in their person residence, but may only purchase 1 ounce at a time.

For more information on the legalization of recreational marijuana, please read the Massachusetts Information for Voters 2016 Ballot Questions booklet that is free, and given to every registered voter.